Fast and Free Shipping on orders over $50!
questions? call 877-992-3753 or visit helpful resources >>

Big Berkey Water Filters

  • Investing in Water Quality

    Public would rather put money behind funding green infrastructure than gray infrastructure for protecting drinking water sources

    The recent Flint water crisis has driven home the importance of protecting drinking water and the need for investing in and maintaining water infrastructure. Yet policy-makers often find it difficult making decisions on where to invest financial resources and how to gain public approval for spending tax payers money in their efforts to protect drinking water sources.


    Now, a recent study undertaken by researchers at the University of Delaware shows that if given a choice, people would rather see money invested in protecting and conserving water resources with green infrastructure, than money being channeled into gray infrastructure such as water treatment facilities.

    The study, which was published in the scientific journal Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, also found that people's eagerness to contribute to water projects were affected to a large extent by different messages related to global warming, climate change, extreme weather events or decaying water infrastructure.6

    "People are much more willing to pay for conservation," said Kent Messer, director of the Center for Experimental and Applied Economics (CEAE) in the University's College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (CANR), and co-author of the paper. "They like the idea of permanently protecting the waters from their source and avoiding having to do technological fixes."

    The study used a field experiment that involved 251 adults from various sites around northern Delaware, including the New Castle Country Farmers Market, University of Delaware's Ag Day, as well as community members from Southbridge, Wilmington. The participants had to perform one simple task, for which they were financially compensated. They then had the option of donating those funds to one of two organizations that could address water quality issues: 1) the Conservation Fund, which funds green infrastructure projects such as construction of bioswales and other green storm water management options; or 2) the American Water Works Associations (AWWA), which funds gray infrastructure projects. The participants leaned heavily towards contributing towards green infrastructure projects.

    "People didn't just show up and automatically receive money. They earned their money. Then, we asked if they wanted to donate it to either a conservation cause (green infrastructure) or to help drinking water utilities (gray infrastructure)," said Messer.

    The researchers also assessed how different messages influenced the choices the participants made. The results of their survey suggest that people are more likely to contribute when message topics focused on global warming or climate change rather than when messages focused on extreme weather events. Consequently, when formulating a message to encourage citizens to help protect water resources, policy-makers need to choose their message topics carefully.

    According to Messer, policy-makers often debate whether it is wise to discuss climate change or whether this topic is best avoided, focusing on extreme weather instead. Yet this study suggests that may be the wrong approach.

    "This research suggests the emphasis on large storms like Hurricane Sandy will actually make people less willing to take action as it appears that people perceive these large storms as being out of human control," said Messer. "If it's just decaying infrastructure, normal storms, or even climate change, then people might feel they can do something about it. But when you start really emphasizing these large magnitude storms, there becomes a sense of hopelessness."

    Journal Reference

    Sean F Ellis, Jacob R Fooks Kent, D Messer and Matthew J Miller. The Effects of Climate Change Information on Charitable Giving for Water Quality Protection: A Field Experiment. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Volume 45, Issue 2 (Economics of Water Quality), August 2016, pp. 319-337, DOI:

  • Testing the Water: DNA Sampling to Detect Water Contaminants

    Water contamination by microbial contaminants is a widespread problem throughout the country. These contaminants make their way into freshwater systems, where they pose a health to humans. While water regulators routinely test water sources for these types of contaminants, the methods used are outdated and unreliable.

    Now, researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have found a way to not only accurately detect microbial contaminants in our waterways, but also to distinguish between different sources of those contaminants.


    Using an award-winning device known as a PhyloChip, which is about the size of a credit card, and which can reliably detect more than 60,000 microbe species, water regulators can now test the waters with greater accuracy. During preliminary testing of the device on Northern California's Russian River watershed, the scientists found cases where this new identified microbes that posed a potential health risk to humans that had not been detected by conventional fecal count tests. The study, which was recently published in the scientific journal Water Science, also found that in some cases the conventional testing methods flagged bacteria that were not considered a health risk to humans.

    "With the PhyloChip, in an overnight test we can get a full picture of the microorganisms in any given sample," said Eric Dubinsky, a microbial ecologist at Berkeley Lab and lead author of the paper. "Instead of targeting one organism, we're essentially getting a fingerprint of the microbial community of potential sources in that sample. So it gives us a more comprehensive picture of what's going on. It's a novel way of going about source tracking."

    Local water regulators currently collect water samples, and then culture the bacteria for 12 hours before checking the levels of two key bacteria types: Enterococcus and E. Coli — which are considered indicators of fecal contamination. But this method fails to distinguish between different sources of the bacteria, which could have originated from cattle, waterfowl, humans, sewage or even rotting vegetation.

    "These tests have been used for decades and are relatively primitive," Dubinsky said. "Back in the 1970s when the Clean Water Act was developed and we had sewage basically flowing into our waters, these tests worked really well. Epidemiological studies showed an association of these bacteria with levels of illness of people who used the water. These bacteria don't necessarily get you sick, but they're found in sewage and fecal matter. That's why they're measured."

    While it is easy to identify point sources, such as sewage outfalls, which generally get cleaned up once they have been identified, non-point sources of pollution, such as runoff from agricultural lands, are more difficult to identify, and are becoming a growing concern.

    The PhyloChip, which was developed by co-author, Gary Andersen, a microbial ecologist at Berkeley Lab, together several colleagues at Berkeley Lab, has proven useful for a number agricultural, medical, and environmental applications, including gaining a better understanding of coral reef ecology, air pollution, and environmental conditions in the Gulf of Mexico following the BP oil disaster. The PhyloChip has 1 million probes which enable it to identify microbes according to variations in a specific gene, without the need to culture the bacteria overnight. The scientists soon realized that the PhyloChip held great potential for assessing water quality and pinpointing the source of water contaminants.

    It is no simple task to determine the source of a pathogen. In many cases, more than one type of microbe is needed to determine the source, as the microbial community of animals such as cows can consist of a thousand different microbial organisms.

    To address this, the scientists coerced a lab intern into going around and collecting poop from a wide range of animals. They then set about cataloguing the microbial communities found in the poop specimens of cattle, horses, pigs, raccoons, sea lions, different bird species, as well as other wildlife, humans and sewage, using that catalogue to develop a model which compares an unknown microbial sample with the samples in their reference library.

    "We've used the PhyloChip in a way that it hasn't been used before by using machine learning models to analyze the data in order to detect and classify sources," Andersen said. "It's essentially giving you a statistical probability that a microbial community came from a particular source."

    After comparing their method with forty others used to track sources of microbial contaminants, their method proved to be the only one that could reliably detect all microbial sources correctly. Even when the microbes originate from an animals source that is not listed in their library catalogue, this method can still prove to be extremely useful in identifying the source. For example, in one study the sample was from a chicken, but the team had not yet analyzed chickens. However, they did have records of pigeons, gulls and geese, which enabled them to determine that the sample came from a bird.

    After extensive sampling within the Russian River watershed, which currently does not comply with the Clean Water Act, the scientists discovered that contamination from human sources was widespread around areas where communities depend largely on aging septic tank systems. They also detected significant contamination from human sources following a weekend jazz concert, which was not as clearly evident when using the other methods. Dubinsky attributes this to the fact that this new methods is much more sensitive to human contaminants that the outdated fecal indicator tests.

    The Berkeley Lab scientists are currently working together with the EPA to develop the method further so that it can be used universally at any location, by anyone, even non-experts. The method also holds promise for determining the sources of nutrients that fuel algal blooms, particularly in the Great Lakes, where this continues to be an ongoing problem.

    If you're concerned your water may be contaminated, the Berkey systems equipped with the black berkey filters will remove bacteria and viruses to levels greater than 99.9999%

    Journal Reference:

    Eric A. Dubinsky, Steven R. Butkus, Gary L. Andersen. Microbial source tracking in impaired watersheds using PhyloChip and machine-learning classification. Water Research, 2016; 105: 56 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.035

  • Are Substitute PFOAs a Threat to Drinking Water Quality?

    With the widespread contamination of drinking water by the industrial chemicals perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorosulphuric acid (PFOS), the US Environmental Protection Agency recently updated their drinking water guidelines for these perfluorinated compounds, issuing a lifetime drinking water health advisory of 70 ppt for human exposure. These chemical compounds are widely used in industry and consumer products, and they persist in the environment, including waterways and aquifers that provide millions of US citizens with drinking water, potentially posing a human health risk.

    One would intuitively believe that regulating the use of harmful pollutants would ultimately have a positive effect on the quality of water. But this is not necessarily the case. Typically, the problem doesn't simply disappear when regulations are implemented, as companies often substitute harmful chemicals with others that have an equally hazardous impact on water quality.


    For example, in the US, the EPA has been working together with large companies such as DuPont in phasing out the use of the hazardous chemical PFOA (),  These are the carcinogenic industrial pollutants responsible for contaminating the drinking water supply of Hoosick Falls and other communities.  This ultimately led to the EPA issuing a health advisory earlier this year. However, according to the water news network, Water Online, DuPont and other companies that use PFOA are highly secretive about the substitute chemicals they are using instead of PFOA, and it is very likely that these replacements are just as hazardous as PFOA itself.

    In an interview on WNYT, Dr David Carpenter, an environmental scientist at the University of Albany, explained:

    "It's been PFOA and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) that's been discontinued, but not the related chemicals that have not been studied so much. The chemicals used to replace these substances present various uncertainties around drinking water quality."

    Carpenter then points out:

    "that the industry is very secretive about what they used to replace PFOA and it's hard to figure out exactly what they are. They're not saying what they replaced it with. It's almost certain that these are perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) with slightly different structures that have not been studied anywhere near the degree that these more common version of perfluorinated compounds have been,"

    According to the WNYT report, the EPA is currently assessing hundreds of alternative substitute PFOA chemicals, and according to an EPA official:

    "There are many reasons to expect a range of toxicities. But more research is needed, particularly on the environmental fate of these compounds to fully evaluate these compounds."

    Ultimately, one has to question whether substituting a known hazardous chemical compound with other chemical compounds (or hundreds of others as may be the case), about which very little if anything is known, offers any benefits in terms of reducing the risk to environmental and human health?

    Note: PFAS's fall under the category of PFC's - Perfluorinated Chemicals. PFOA, PFOS, etc.  The Black Berkey elements that come standard with our Berkey systems do reduce these contaminates.  Berkey water filter PFOA test results can be found here.

  • Drugs in Wastewater Unlikely Crime Busters

    Legal and illegal drugs in wastewater poses both an ecological and human health challenge as they can make their way into freshwater systems and drinking water sources where they can harm wildlife and pose a human health risk. Now, new research shows that wastewater treatment facilities can play a key role in helping to monitor drug usage, and may ultimately help track drug dealers peddling their contraband.

    Swiss scientists recently tested the limitations of using wastewater analysis to crack down on crime. The results of their study was recently published in the journal Forensic Science. The researchers point out that analyzing wastewater to gain a better understanding of drug use is not new — in fact, it even has a name: wastewater-based epidemiology — however, up until now, very little focus has been placed on using this as a mechanism to fight crime. Yet, it can provide pertinent information to law enforcement that can be very useful to help whittle out drug dealers and combat crime.

    water-treatment-plant courtesy:

    Drugs break down within the body, leaving tell-tale traces of metabolites which are excreted as waste. These metabolites can be identified in wastewater, quantified and then back-calculated to determine how much of the drug was originally consumed, as well as provide a good estimate of how many people contributed to the sample. This analysis can provide insight on average drug consumption together with information on changing drug use patterns.

    For the study, which focused on the use of methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine in two Swiss cities, the scientists analyzed wastewater and compared it to information received from police intelligence. To get an estimate of heroin usage in the Swiss city of Lausanne, the researchers measured morphine in sewage wastewater and subtracted the amount that was legally prescribed by medical practitioners. Using this method, from October 2013 to December 2014 the researchers estimated the average daily heroin consumption for the city to be 13 grams.

    During this period, law enforcement officers arrested two drug dealers. After analyzing their phone records and conducting interviews with drug users, it is estimated that between the two of them, the drug dealers supplied around 6 grams of heroin a day — roughly half the market share. This information provided by the wastewater epidemiology supported police intelligence suggesting that unlike methamphetamine and other drugs, heroin is supplied by just a handful of local drug dealers, who police could target effectively.

    As the study so succinctly point out: "You can flush, but you can't hide."

    "Combined with intelligence resulting from police work (e.g., investigations and informants), wastewater analysis can contribute to deciphering the structure of drug markets, as well as the local organization of trafficking networks," the authors conclude. "The results presented here constitute valuable pieces of information, which can be used by law enforcement to guide decisions at strategic and/or operational levels. Furthermore, intelligence gathered through investigations and surveillance constitutes an alternative viewpoint to evaluate results of wastewater analysis."

    The study's findings suggest that for some drugs, the wastewater-based epidemiology can be an effective tool to help law enforcement determine the market share that criminal elements control within the local drug market.

    Journal Reference

    Been, F. et al. Analysis of illicit drugs in wastewater – Is there an added value for law enforcement? Forensic Science International, Volume 266 , 215 - 221; DOI:

  • Strategies to Mitigate Environmental Damage Caused by Dams

    Throughout the world, dams provide us with essential water supplies needed for drinking, crop irrigation, hydropower and industry. There are around 58,000 large dams, exceeding 15 meters in height, built on rivers around the world. Yet, while these dams provide us with water essential to our survival, and hydropower is seen as a green energy source, the construction of dams on our waterways comes at a significant cost to the environment.

    But managing rivers so that they meet both the needs of human society and that of aquatic ecosystems is a complex challenge. Communities need water as well as power, but building dams on rivers disrupts ecosystem functions and the services these ecosystems provide.


    A recent study conducted by researchers from Utah and Colorado State Universities at Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River provides some insight into how to best mitigate the negative impact that dams have on the environment, including proposing a new management method to reduce the impact of hydropeaking — a practice that is commonly used by hydropower dams, which has a negative impact on aquatic food webs further downstream.

    The researchers discuss their findings under the context of increasing global pressure to construct more dams, in a paper that was recently published in the scientific journal Science.

    "Dams change rivers by creating artificial lakes, fragmenting river networks and distorting natural patterns of sediment transport and seasonal variations in water temperature and stream flow," says co-author Jack Schmidt, a professor in the Department of Watershed Sciences at Utah State University, who served as chief of the U.S. Geological Survey's Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center from 2011 to 2014.

    Hydropeaking, is the practice commonly used by hydroelectric dams whereby river flows are increased during times of peak electricity demand by consumers. Aquatic insects, which form an essential part of river food webs, are particular vulnerable to the effects of hydropeaking. Insects lay their eggs on submerged aquatic vegetation near the shoreline, but drastic fluctuations in water levels can expose the eggs and/or larvae, causing them to dry out and die.

    "Hydropeaking creates a fluctuating daily pattern of water flows that can severely impair productive shoreline habitats through repeated wetting and drying. A conundrum for river scientists and managers is how to counter these negative effects in a cost-effective manner," says Schmidt. "Managers have to meet customer demand so total elimination of hydropeaking isn't an option. However, we assert that even small adjustments to river flow regimes might help to restore river ecosystems."

    The authors reviewed recent studies that focus on the impact of dams and dam operations on downstream ecosystems, which show how small changes in dam management can have a big positive impact further downstream. For example in a previous hydropeaking study looking at the impact on ecosystems further downstream, the authors suggest "giving aquatic insects the weekend off." Schmidt agrees; by giving insects a two day break from hydropeaking activities, may give them time to recover, which may allow a more natural aquatic food web to re-establish in the river, benefitting fish in the river ecosystem.

    While restoration efforts at existing hydroelectric dams is a good start to addressing the issue, the authors recommend that any new proposed dam project in South America, Asia and Africa should only go ahead after cautious planning and careful consideration is given to their design, location, overall number, and how the proposed new dam will be managed.

    While hydropower is considered a renewable source of energy, it is not always 'green' unless careful consideration is given to the location and operation of those dams to mitigate negative ecological effects.

    "In a world of growing demand for water and energy, we face an increasingly uncertain hydrological future," says Schmidt. "We have to balance economic gain against environmental degradation."

    Journal Reference
    N. LeRoy Poff & John C. Schmidt. How dams can go with the flow. Science; 09 Sep 2016: Vol. 353, Issue 6304, pp. 1099-1100. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah4926

    Image Suggestion

  • BPA can Reprogram the Brain, Changing Sexual Behavior of Turtles

    BPA is an endocrine disrupting chemical that is used in a wide range of everyday items, including plastic water bottles, food cans and till slips. It is a harmful contaminant that has been associated with many health issues in both humans and wildlife that are exposed to it. BPA makes its way into the environment, and tends to accumulate in aquatic systems where it can negatively impact aquatic wildlife that live there.

    An earlier study conducted by scientists from the University of Missouri-Columbia on painted turtles revealed that BPA disrupts reproductive functioning and can feminize male turtles, causing them to develop female sex organs. In a more recent study, the researchers show how BPA not only physically feminizes male turtles, but it also reprograms the brain, making them exhibit behavioral patterns usually associated with female turtles. The scientists are concerned about the impact this could have on the population status of painted turtles, which could decline as a result.


    According to Cheryl Rosenfeld, an associate professor of biomedical sciences in the MU College of Veterinary Medicine and co-author of this study, the initial study showed that BPA and ethinyl estradiol (EE2), a hormone used in oral contraceptives, could reverse the sex of male turtles, changing them into females.

    "Painted turtles and other reptiles lack sex chromosomes," she explains. "The gender of painted turtles and other reptiles is determined by the incubation temperature of the egg during development. Studies have shown that exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as BPA, can override incubation temperature and switch the sex of males to females. In our latest study, we found that BPA also affects how the male brain is 'wired,' potentially inducing males to show female type behavioral patterns."

    For their study, the scientists exposed painted turtle eggs to BPA and ethinyl estradiol (EE2) in liquid form, then placed the eggs in an incubator set at a temperature that would typically result in male hatchlings. When the hatchlings were 5 months old the researchers tested their spacial navigation skills to ascertain whether exposure to these chemicals would have any impact on the navigational ability — more specifically, to determine whether their navigational skills would be in line with that expected of females who are better navigators than their male counterparts. The results of the navigational test showed male turtles that were exposed to these hormone disrupting chemicals while still in the egg exhibited better spatial navigational learning and memory skills than male turtles incubated under the same environmental conditions, but which did not get exposed to BPA and EE2 whilst developing in the egg.


    "While improved spatial navigation might be considered a good thing, it also may suggest that when they reach adulthood male turtles will not exhibit courtship behaviors needed to attract a mate and reproduce, which could result in dramatic population declines," explains Rosenfeld.

    According to Professor Rosenfeld, this study is the first to show how these harmful environmental contaminants not only change the physical sexual characteristics of turtles, but affects brain functioning as well. Turtles are considered an 'indicator species' as they can be used to determine the environmental health of the broader aquatic ecosystem. Gaining a clearer understanding of how these endocrine disrupting compounds affect the sexual behavior and orientation of turtles, may enable scientists to better understand the potential impacts of these chemicals on other animal species, including humans.

    The Berkey  water filter, equipped with the black berkey filters, will filter out any BPA that may be in the water.

    Journal Reference

    Lindsey K. Manshack, Caroline M. Conard, Sarah A. Johnson, Jorden M. Alex, Sara J. Bryan, Sharon L. Deem, Dawn K. Holliday, Mark R. Ellersieck, Cheryl S. Rosenfeld. Effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol A and ethinyl estradiol on spatial navigational learning and memory in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Hormones and Behavior, 2016; 85: 48 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.07.009

    Images Suggestions:


  • Industrial Chemicals found in American Alligators & African Crocodiles

    Two pioneering new studies examined perfluorinated alkyl acid (PFAA) concentrations in 'sentinel' reptiles, and could prove to be particularly useful for assessing the long-term impact of environmentally persistent chemicals.

    While alligators in American waterways and crocodiles in South African aquatic systems inhabit freshwater systems on separate continents, thousands of miles apart, two new studies conducted by scientists from Hollings Marine Laboratory, Charleston, South Carolina, have found that both species have persistent industrial chemicals used for non-stick coatings at detectable levels in their blood.

    perfluorinated compounds berkey filter PFAA perfluorinated compounds berkey filter PFAA

    Some of the compounds included in this environmentally persistent group of chemicals — which have been associated with reduced fertility, liver toxicity, and a wide range of other health issues in both animals and humans — are no longer in use in the US and many other countries. Yet, blood samples taken from 125 American alligators at 12 different sites across South Carolina and Florida, showed that all had at least 6 out of 15 PFAAs being tracked for the study.

    The study, together with a similar study on South African crocodiles conducted by colleagues, is the first to examine PFAA levels in indicator reptile species, which are particularly useful for studying the affects of persistent chemicals that linger in the environment. PFAA compounds were historically used in common industrial and household products, including non-stick frying pans, fire-fighting foam, household and industrial waxes, stain repellents and water-resistant clothing.

    Implications for Drinking Water

    The blood levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the alligators ranged between 1,360 - 452,000 ppt (parts per trillion). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a health advisory for PFOS and other PFAAs in drinking water early this year, recommending a drinking water standard of 70 ppt as the maximum combined exposure level for the two PFAAs in question. The researchers suggest that the high blood concentrations of PFOS found in alligators across several sites is concerning, and may imply that drinking water needs to be tested at those sites to limit human exposure to these hazardous chemicals.

    "Alligators and crocodiles play a dominant role in their ecosystems," said Jacqueline Bangma, of the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. "Similar to humans, they are long-lived top predators. They stay in a select territory--waterways where runoff from human activities accumulates-- and their PFAA burden increases through the consumption of fish."

    Contamination Hot Spots

    Both the US and South African study revealed "hot spots," where alligators and/or crocodiles had significantly higher levels of PFAA compared to animals at other locations. In the US, these tended to be on Florida's Merrit Island and on Kiaway Island situated in the Atlantic Ocean to the southwest of Charleston, SC. The high PFAA levels in these areas may be due to historical use of fire-fighting foams containing PFAAs, as high levels have been found in the environment around fire-training and manufacturing sites.

    Exposure to Other Environmental Contaminants

    By comparison, alligators in the Florida Everglades had the lowest concentrations of two of the most prevalent PFAAs found in all of the US alligators sampled. This came as a bit of a surprise to the researchers, as compared to other alligators in Florida, alligators in the Everglades have been found to have the highest concentrations of mercury.

    The Black Berkey elements that come standard with our Berkey systems do reduce Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFOA, PFOS, PFAA contaminates).  Berkey water filter Perfluorinated Chemical test results can be found here.

    Journal Reference/s

    J.T. Bangma, J.A. Bowden, A.M. Brunell, I. Christie, B. Finnell, M.P. Guillette, M. Jones, R.H. Lowers, T.R. Rainwater, J.L. Reiner, P.M. Wilkinson and L.J. Guillette, Jr. Perfluorinated alkyl acids in plasma of American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) from Florida and South Carolina. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Accepted manuscript online: August 20, 2016. doi:10.1002/etc.3600

    I. Christie, J.L. Reiner, J.A. Bowden, H. Botha, T.M. Cantu, D. Govender, M.P. Guillettee, R.H. Lowers, W.J. Luus-Powell, D. Pienaar, W.J. Smit and L.J. Guillette Jr. Perfluorinated alkyl acids in the plasma of South African crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus). Chemosphere. Published: July 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.072.

    Suggested Images

  • New Radiation Testing Results for Black Berkey Filters

    After much anticipation, we are happy to announce the release of new radiation testing results for the black berkey filters.  Below, please find a summary of the 3 sets of black berkey radiation tests.

    Gross Alpha Reduction Testing Report <-- Link to 1st Set of Test Results

    The Gravity Black Berkey Filter reduced the Gross Alpha concentration in the tap water by at least 98.7 %. The EPA limit for Gross Alpha is 15 pCi/L; the Gravity Black Berkey Filter meets the EPA requirements for drinking water.

    Potential gross alpha contaminants/emitters in water:

    Plutonium-238 and -239
    Radium-226 and -228
    Uranium-235 and -238

    Gross Beta Reduction Testing Report <-- Link to 2nd Set of Test Results

    The Gravity Black Berkey Filter reduced the Gross Beta concentration in the tap water by at least 95.3 %. The EPA limit for Gross Beta is 15 pCi/L; the Gravity Black Berkey Filter meets the EPA requirements for drinking water.

    Potential Gross Beta contaminants/emitters in water:

    Californium-251 and -252
    Iodine-129 and -131

    Uranium Reduction Test Report <-- Link to 3rd Set of Test Results

    The Gravity Black Berkey Filter reduced the Uranium concentration in the tap water by at least 97.0 %. The EPA limit for Uranium is 30 µg/L; the Gravity Black Berkey Filter meets the EPA requirements for drinking water.

  • Are Well Owners More Environmentally Conscious?

    Water well owners in Kansas tend to be more aware of issues relating to state water policies than citizens whose water is supplied by municipal water networks, a new study has found. This could in turn have implications for environmental policy and groundwater management, says Brock Ternes, a PhD student at the University of Kansas, who conducted the study for his doctoral thesis in sociology.

    For his study, Ternes conducted a survey interviewing 864 Kansas residents, questioning them about their water supply and water use habits, as well as their awareness to water related issues, including policy. He found that residents that depended on private wells for their water supply were more concerned with issues related to water depletion in the High Plains Aquifer — the underground aquifer that serves as a freshwater reservoir lying beneath a large portion of western Kansas — and tended to be significantly more informed about state water policies and more aware of key water management agencies than those who didn't own wells.

    "The people who use private wells for water are more likely to hear about water-related policy issues and pay attention to them," said Ternes, who will present his study at the 111th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA) this week.


    He found, for example, that well owners were more knowledgeable about the proposed Kansas Aqueduct — an $18 billion waterworks project that would involve diverting water from the Missouri River to provide water to water scarce areas of western Kansas. Residents who didn't own wells tended to be less aware of this gigantic water project.

    Like many other regions that have been affected by recent droughts, rural Kansas has been suffering from water scarcity issues. Water extraction from the High Plains Aquifer, which is the primary source of groundwater for the region, has been excessive to meet irrigation demands of the agricultural sector, and researchers caution that wells in some areas of southwestern Kansas are likely to run dry in the next 25 years if pumping is not curtailed.

    Ternes' water survey also revealed that well owners considered water conservation a top priority to ensure they would still have water in the future. Ternes refers to the term 'groundwater citizenship' which encourages aquifer stewardship and concerted water conservation efforts to ensure groundwater supplies are not depleted so that there will still be water available in the future.

    "Most well owners believe securing water is one of the top political challenges facing Kansas, and water policies are more likely to influence their vote in local and state elections than Kansans who don't own wells," said Ternes. "My data suggest that well owners have different political priorities than non-well owners and conserve water with the hopes of extending their supply, which makes them a unique type of citizen."

    Ternes believes the study could provide valuable information to Kansas water officials and policymakers in looking for potential solutions for preventing the High Plains Aquifer from becoming depleted. If they grasp the significance of engaging with well owners who feel strongly about water conserving water, it can help boost public awareness of water conservation issues generally, bringing these important issues more into the limelight.

    "Water supply infrastructure is clearly connected to how in-tune people are with their natural resources, which is profoundly important for environmental policymaking and survival in the Anthropocene," Ternes said.

    Many states are vulnerable to water exploitation, which is exacerbated in times of drought. Yet water resources need to be managed appropriately to ensure water availability in the future. In this modern day and age, with improved technologies that allow us to readily access natural resources such as water, it may seem that water availability is much higher that what it really is, when in fact it is a finite resource that is now more scarce than ever.


    The paper, "'Groundwater Citizenship' and Water Supply Awareness: Investigating Water-Related Infrastructure, the Kansas Aqueduct, and Well Ownership," will be presented on Monday, Aug. 22, at 8:30 a.m. PDT in Seattle at the American Sociological Association's 111th Annual Meeting.

  • 218 Million Americans Exposed to Dangerous Levels of Chromium-6 in Their Water & Berkey Will Remove It

    "There is scientific uncertainty regarding safe levels of this chemical in drinking water and possible long-term consequences of ingestion. But this new analysis from the Environmental Working Group, an independent advocacy group, examines evidence from water systems throughout the nation and concludes that the tap water of 218 million Americans contains levels of chromium-6 that the group considers dangerous." More details from CNN article here.

    Yes, the black berkey filters that come standard with our berkey systems do filter out and remove chromium 6 from the water.

    These berkey test results for chromium 6 can be found here.

    And don't forget, is the only company to offer an exclusive extended lifetime warranty. More details here. This is not available from other sellers.

Items 91 to 100 of 453 total