What are PFAS Chemicals? Does the Berkey Remove PFOA and PFOS; and other FAQs?

Do Berkey Water Filters Remove PFAS and Forever Chemicals?

Last updated: March 17, 2026 By Dan DeBaun
Both the Berkey Phoenix and Black Berkey filter elements remove PFAS from drinking water, reducing PFOA and PFOS by 99% or more as confirmed by independent lab testing. The Berkey Phoenix is the currently available element and has been tested across 5 PFAS compounds including GenX. Below we cover how each element performs, what the EPA's 2024 drinking water limits mean for you, and answers to the most common PFAS questions.

Do Berkey Water Filters Remove PFAS?

Yes. Both Berkey filter element lines have been independently tested for PFAS reduction. The Berkey Phoenix is tested by NABL-accredited, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 certified laboratories. Black Berkey elements are tested by independent, EPA and NSF-accredited third-party labs. The Berkey Phoenix is the currently available element; Black Berkey elements are temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing EPA regulatory matter.

Available Now

Berkey Phoenix Filter Elements

  • 5 PFAS compounds tested (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, PFDA) - 99%+ removal
  • GenX (HFPO-DA) - independently tested, one of very few gravity filter elements to include this compound
  • Long-term capacity - PFOA and PFOS removal maintained above 99% through 1,500 liters, tested at 5 intervals per NSF/ANSI 53 protocols
  • Certified: NSF/ANSI 42 & NSF/ANSI/CAN 372
  • Filter lifespan: 5,500 gallons per pair
  • Labs: CVR Labs and RAYNU Analytical Labs (ISO/IEC 17025:2017)

View Phoenix PFAS lab results →

Currently Unavailable

Black Berkey Filter Elements

  • 25 PFAS compounds - reduced to non-detectable levels
  • PFOA - reduced by more than 99%, to below 2 parts per trillion (below EPA's 4 ppt MCL)
  • PFOS - reduced by more than 99%
  • Filter lifespan: 6,000 gallons per pair
  • Tested to NSF/ANSI standards by independent, EPA-accredited third-party laboratories
Black Berkey elements are temporarily unavailable. The Berkey Phoenix is the current replacement. View Black Berkey PFAS lab results →

To put these results in context: the EPA's enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for PFOA and PFOS is 4 parts per trillion (finalized April 2024). Both Berkey filter element lines have been independently tested to reduce PFOA and PFOS well below this federal limit. Full downloadable lab reports are available here. Berkey's PFAS test results have also been recognized by third-party publications including EWG and CBS News - see our media coverage page for verified sources.

How Widespread Is PFAS Contamination in the U.S.?

PFAS contamination in American drinking water is far more widespread than earlier estimates suggested. Updated EPA data published in February 2026 shows the scale of the problem has grown significantly:

151M Americans served by water systems with detectable PFAS (EPA, Feb 2026)
52M Americans served by systems above EPA's enforceable limits
40M+ Private well users with no federal PFAS protection

Contamination is particularly elevated in states with histories of industrial manufacturing and military base activity. New Jersey, Minnesota, and Connecticut have adopted stricter PFAS limits than the federal standard. The EWG maintains a real-time PFAS contamination map where you can check your specific water system.

Private well users face an additional challenge: the EPA's enforceable MCLs apply only to regulated public water systems. Homeowners on private wells have no federal requirement compelling testing or treatment, making point-of-use filtration the primary line of defense.

What Does the EPA Say About PFAS in Drinking Water?

In April 2024, the EPA finalized the first-ever legally enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS in drinking water, replacing the previous non-enforceable 70 ppt health advisory. The new limits:

  • PFOA and PFOS: 4 parts per trillion (ppt) - individually
  • PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX: 10 ppt - individually

The EPA also set a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) of zero for both PFOA and PFOS - meaning the agency's own science concludes there is no exposure level without risk of health impact. The 4 ppt MCL reflects the lowest level feasible for public water system treatment, not a safe threshold.

May 2025 update: The Trump administration announced enforcement rollbacks on 4 of the 6 regulated PFAS compounds (PFNA, PFHxS, GenX, and PFBS), delaying compliance requirements for public water systems. PFOA and PFOS MCLs remain in effect and enforceable. Public water utilities have until 2029 - with a potential extension to 2031 - to comply with the PFOA and PFOS limits. Until then, millions of Americans may be consuming water above federal limits with no immediate action required from their utility.

The Environmental Working Group recommends an even more cautious limit of 1 ppt for individual PFAS compounds - four times lower than the EPA's enforceable MCL - to account for cumulative exposure from food, packaging, and other non-water sources.

What Are PFAS and Forever Chemicals?

PFAS stands for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances - a group of more than 15,000 synthetic chemicals built around an exceptionally strong carbon-fluorine bond. That bond is what makes them so durable in manufacturing applications and so persistent in the environment: PFAS do not break down under normal conditions, which is why they are called "forever chemicals."

PFAS are used in the manufacture of hundreds of common household and industrial products: non-stick cookware (Teflon), food packaging, water- and stain-resistant fabrics (Scotchguard), firefighting foam, wax, paint, and polish. Firefighting foam used in training exercises at military bases and airports has been one of the most significant sources of groundwater contamination across the U.S.

What Are PFOA and PFOS?

PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate) are two of the most extensively studied and regulated chemicals in the PFAS group. Both have been produced in the United States and internationally since the 1940s and were used widely until phase-outs began in the early 2000s. They are both C8 fluorinated compounds - meaning they contain 8 carbon atoms in their molecular structure - and are resistant to both water and lipids. That resistance makes them valuable industrially but means they accumulate in the environment and in human and animal body tissue over time.

How Does PFAS Get Into Drinking Water?

PFAS enters drinking water through several pathways. Legacy contamination from firefighting foam at military bases and airports has leached into soils and groundwater for decades. Because PFAS do not break down, groundwater contamination persists long after the original source has been removed or banned.

Industrial discharge is another major route - factory emissions can release PFAS in airborne particles that settle into surface water and soils. Contaminated sewage sludge spread on agricultural land has also been identified as a significant source in multiple states. The DuPont case in Parkersburg, West Virginia - where PFOA manufacturing contaminated the local water supply for decades - is one of the most well-documented examples, resulting in a $671 million settlement with approximately 3,500 affected residents.

What Are the Health Risks of PFAS Exposure?

Research has linked PFAS exposure to a range of health effects, with the strongest evidence concentrated around PFOA and PFOS. Documented associations include:

  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Immune system suppression, including reduced vaccine efficacy in children
  • Thyroid hormone disruption
  • Increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer (PFOA)
  • Low infant birth weight and developmental effects
  • Liver and kidney effects in animal studies

The EWG considers the broader PFAS class - more than 15,000 chemicals - an issue of concern as a group, because even low-level exposure to certain compounds can affect the endocrine and immune systems. The EPA's decision to set an MCLG of zero for PFOA and PFOS reflects the scientific consensus that there is no safe exposure threshold for these two compounds.

How Long Do PFAS Stay in the Body?

PFAS chemicals do not metabolize once ingested. They persist in body tissue essentially unchanged. For PFOA and PFOS specifically, the biological half-life is approximately 4 years - meaning it takes roughly 4 years for levels in the body to drop by half after exposure stops. With ongoing daily ingestion through contaminated water, PFAS accumulate over time. Reducing PFAS intake through filtration at the point of use is one of the most direct ways to limit ongoing accumulation.

Does Boiling Water Remove PFAS?

No. PFAS chemicals are water-resistant and thermally stable - boiling does not break them down or remove them. Boiling water that contains PFAS will actually concentrate the contamination as water evaporates, increasing the parts-per-trillion level in what remains. Effective PFAS reduction requires filtration technologies proven to remove these compounds.

How Does Berkey Compare to Other PFAS Removal Methods?

Several filtration technologies can reduce PFAS in drinking water. The primary options available for home use, and how they compare:

→ Scroll to see full table

Method PFAS Reduction Minerals Retained Electricity Required Approx. Cost Per Gallon
Berkey Phoenix (gravity) 99%+ (5 compounds) Yes No ~$0.02
Black Berkey (gravity, unavailable) 99%+ (25 compounds) Yes No ~$0.02
Reverse Osmosis 90–99% No (remineralize separately) Yes (pump pressure) $0.05–$0.15
Activated Carbon Pitcher 40–70% (varies) Yes No $0.15–$0.30
Bottled Water Variable - not independently verified at point of sale Variable No $0.50–$3.00+

Reverse osmosis (RO) is a legitimate alternative for PFAS reduction and performs well. The primary trade-offs are cost (installation runs $200–$600+), demineralization of filtered water, and ongoing electricity use. Gravity filtration's core advantages are mineral retention, zero electricity dependence, portability, and cost per gallon.

What About GenX and Newer PFAS Compounds?

GenX (HFPO-DA) is a synthetic chemical developed as a replacement for PFOA in non-stick and industrial manufacturing. It has been detected in drinking water in several U.S. regions, most notably the Cape Fear River basin in North Carolina, and is regulated by the EPA at a 10 ppt MCL under the April 2024 final rule.

The Berkey Phoenix filter elements have been independently tested for GenX (HFPO-DA) removal as part of their 2025 testing program - making them one of very few gravity filter elements to include this compound in published lab data. Results are available in the Phoenix lab results.

For Black Berkey elements, GenX has not been specifically tested as a named compound. Because GenX shares structural characteristics with PFOA, the expectation is that performance would be consistent - but until dedicated testing is completed, no confirmed removal claim can be made for that element line.

On transparency: More than 15,000 PFAS compounds have been identified. No filter on the market removes all of them, and any claim to the contrary should be treated skeptically. Berkey's approach is to test for the compounds with the most regulatory and health significance, publish full lab documentation, and be clear about what has and has not been tested.

How Can You Reduce PFAS Exposure?

PFAS exposure is not limited to drinking water. Common non-water sources include fast food wrappers and takeout containers (typically PFAS-coated), microwave popcorn bags, non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabric treatments, and some personal care products. Reducing overall exposure means addressing both water and non-water sources.

For drinking water specifically:

  • Check your water system's PFAS status using the EWG PFAS contamination map
  • If your system shows detectable PFAS, point-of-use filtration with independently tested, lab-documented elements is the most reliable at-home solution
  • Replace filter elements on schedule - filter capacity is finite, and PFAS reduction performance degrades over time with heavy use

The EWG's guide to avoiding PFAS covers non-water exposure sources in detail.

Frequently Asked Questions About Berkey and PFAS

Does Berkey remove PFAS from drinking water?

Yes. Both Berkey filter element lines have been independently tested and confirmed to reduce PFAS. The Berkey Phoenix (currently available) reduces PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFDA at 99% or higher through 1,500 liters of use. Black Berkey elements (currently unavailable) have been tested across 25 PFAS compounds, bringing PFOA to below 2 ppt. Full lab documentation is available at bigberkeywaterfilters.com/pages/helpful-resources-test-results.

Which Berkey filter element should I use for PFAS removal - Phoenix or Black Berkey?

The Berkey Phoenix is the currently available element and is what ships with all new Berkey systems. It has been independently tested for 5 PFAS compounds including GenX, with NSF/ANSI 42 and NSF/ANSI/CAN 372 certifications. Black Berkey elements are temporarily unavailable due to an EPA regulatory matter. When available, Black Berkey elements have broader PFAS test data (25 compounds). Either element line delivers meaningful, lab-verified PFAS reduction.

Does Berkey remove PFOA and PFOS?

Yes. Both element lines reduce PFOA and PFOS by 99% or more. Black Berkey elements reduce PFOA to below 2 ppt - well below the EPA's enforceable MCL of 4 ppt. Phoenix elements reduce both compounds at 99%+ through long-term capacity testing at 1,500 liters, tested at 5 intervals per NSF/ANSI 53 protocols. Independent lab reports for both are publicly available as downloadable PDFs.

What PFAS compounds has the Berkey Phoenix been tested for?

The Berkey Phoenix has been independently tested for 5 PFAS compounds: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFDA - plus GenX (HFPO-DA). Testing was conducted by CVR Labs and RAYNU Analytical Labs, both NABL-accredited and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 certified. Full results are available on the Phoenix lab results page.

Does the Berkey Phoenix remove GenX?

Yes. The Berkey Phoenix was independently tested for GenX (HFPO-DA) as part of its 2025 testing program, making it one of very few gravity filter elements to include this compound in published lab data. GenX is regulated by the EPA at 10 ppt under the April 2024 final rule. Results are in the Phoenix lab results.

How does Berkey compare to reverse osmosis for PFAS removal?

Both are effective. Reverse osmosis reduces PFAS at 90–99% and is a legitimate option. The key differences: RO strips beneficial minerals from water and requires electricity (pump pressure), while Berkey gravity filtration retains minerals, requires no electricity, and is portable. RO systems typically cost $200–$600 to install; Berkey's cost per gallon runs approximately $0.02. For households that want PFAS reduction without plumbing modifications or power dependence, Berkey is a strong alternative.

Is Berkey NSF certified for PFAS removal?

The Berkey Phoenix filter elements carry NSF/ANSI 42 and NSF/ANSI/CAN 372 certifications. PFAS reduction testing for Phoenix was conducted per NSF/ANSI 53 protocols by ISO/IEC 17025:2017 certified laboratories, with results verified through 1,500 liters. Black Berkey elements are tested to NSF/ANSI standards by independent, EPA-accredited third-party laboratories, though they do not carry formal NSF certification. All lab reports are publicly available as downloadable PDFs at bigberkeywaterfilters.com/pages/helpful-resources-test-results.

What is the EPA limit for PFAS in drinking water?

The EPA finalized enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) in April 2024: 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS individually, and 10 ppt for PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX individually. The EPA also set a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) of zero for PFOA and PFOS, indicating no exposure level without potential health risk. In May 2025, the Trump administration rolled back enforcement on 4 of the 6 regulated compounds; PFOA and PFOS limits remain enforceable. Public water utilities have until 2029 to comply.

How do I know if my water has PFAS?

The EWG maintains a real-time PFAS contamination map at ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination where you can search by zip code or water system. For public water utilities, PFAS testing data is increasingly available through your annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR). Private well users have no federal testing requirement and would need to commission independent testing through a certified lab - contact your state environmental agency for a list of accredited labs.

Does the PF-2 fluoride filter also remove PFAS?

The PF-2 fluoride reduction filter is specifically designed for fluoride and arsenic reduction and is used as an add-on to the primary Berkey filter elements. PFAS reduction is handled by the primary filter elements (Phoenix or Black Berkey), not the PF-2. When using PF-2 post-filters alongside PFAS-contaminated water, ensure your primary elements are current and within their rated capacity, as these do the heavy work of PFAS reduction.

Protect Your Family from PFAS

View lab-verified test results for both Phoenix and Black Berkey filter elements - or shop the full line of Berkey gravity filter systems.

Dan DeBaun

Dan DeBaun

Dan is the owner and operator of Big Berkey Water Filters. Prior to Berkey, Dan was an asset manager for a major telecommunications company. He graduated from Rutgers with an undergraduate degree in industrial engineering, followed by an MBA in finance from Rutgers as well. Dan enjoys biohacking, exercising, meditation, beach life, and spending time with family and friends.

~ The Owner of Big Berkey Water Filters

Back to blog
  • Avatar of Corina Horan Corina Horan 2023-07-08 23:35:55

    Would appreciate to know if and when a test can be done on the new GenX chemical can be done or will be done?

  • Avatar of Regina Smardon Regina Smardon 2022-11-04 14:51:55

    Peer reviewed research suggests that Berkey is not particularly effective at removing GenX. GenX is not a long chain PFAS chemical so this may be part of the reason, it is actually smaller than PFOA, n fact it is a byprodcut of the PFOA process.

    Herkert, Nicholas J., John Merrill, Cara Peters, David Bollinger, Sharon Zhang, Kate Hoffman, P. Lee Ferguson, Detlef R. U, Knappe and Heather Stapleton. (2020). Assessing the Effectiveness of Point-of-Use Residential Drinking Water Filters for Perfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS). Environmental Science and Technology Letters. 7(3): 178-184.

  • Avatar of Dan DeBaun Dan DeBaun 2022-11-05 15:05:29

    Hi Regina -

    Thank you for your comment This study only tested one countertop filter and there's dozens on the market. It did not list the brand they tested, so we would not assumed it's a Berkey. Different countertop systems employ different media formulas, so one countertop system not performing well, doesn't mean another will not. With that being said, until tests are done on the Berkey regarding GenX removal, we would not recommend the Berkey for it's removal.

    Thanks
    Dan

  • Avatar of anita critcher anita critcher 2020-02-21 02:28:35

    Hi Dan! Its been years since I have had the opportunity to speak directly with you as you became so busy and I did all my ordering through Sue, and now she has retired. I bought my first Berkey, oh my goodness it had to have been around 2002 or there about, and have since bought two more for family plus the travel one to carry in the semi. They are all doing as intended and I am so glad we have them. I have just recently retired off the road after 25 years long haul and am healing from a right knee replacement, scheduled for a left hip replacement and etc.. things one seems to need as age creeps up on us. All my best to you and the crew.

    Sincerely,

    Anita

  • Avatar of Dan Dan 2020-02-21 16:04:41

    Hi Anita!!

    So glad to hear you and I'm happy the systems are working well for you and your family. And I also glad you finally retired. More time to focus on getting your health back in tip-top form! Enjoy your retirement and live in the moment Anita! If you ever need anything, ask for Jennie. She replaced Sue/Ann.

    Thanks
    Dan